|
|
Post by mjjracer on Jun 6, 2017 15:22:30 GMT -5
And I like it!
I don't recall this being posted before. If so: Never mind.
MJ
|
|
|
|
Post by dusfincher on Jun 6, 2017 15:59:02 GMT -5
I wonder if that rear wing will get bigger. I seem to remember people complaining the numbers were hard to see on the current car and those endplates are tiny
|
|
|
|
Post by mjjracer on Jun 6, 2017 18:18:40 GMT -5
I wonder if that rear wing will get bigger. I seem to remember people complaining the numbers were hard to see on the current car and those endplates are tiny Yeah, I was thinking that rear wing, as lovely as it is, would not make the final cut. I don't even know enough about aerodynamics to be dangerous, but I would think the gentle downward slope of the end plates might actually reduce down force. MJ |
|
AJ
Podium Finisher
I live in a world of bright reds, oranges, and yellows!
Posts: 362
|
Post by AJ on Jun 7, 2017 11:55:50 GMT -5
the slight downward bend helps clean the air up off of the rear wing and makes less turbulence for the car behind.
|
|
|
|
Post by mjjracer on Jun 7, 2017 16:49:13 GMT -5
the slight downward bend helps clean the air up off of the rear wing and makes less turbulence for the car behind. Thanks. I like the look of it. I also will not seek employment as an aerodynamicist after I retire. :-) MJ |
|
|
|
Post by pje on Jun 7, 2017 17:08:34 GMT -5
If I understand the design of the undertray on this car it develops a substantial increase in ground effect over the present car. It looks to me from the wing sizes that we're going back to the '80's as far as wing sizes. Which is fine with me.
Paul Erlendson
|
|
|
|
Post by proctorp on Jun 16, 2017 11:41:23 GMT -5
Looks great!
|
|
|
|
Post by mjjracer on Jul 24, 2017 17:53:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by 2lapsdown on Jul 24, 2017 18:13:18 GMT -5
Back to the future!!
John
|
|
|
|
Post by clm1545 on Jul 30, 2017 18:52:35 GMT -5
Saw the car on TV,today It looks pretty
good
|
|
